ArticleObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2026
Mapping Movement Integration in Secondary Schools: A Scoping Review of Evidence.
Article in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPhysical activity (PA) is essential for adolescents' healthy development, yet many fall short of PA guidelines. Movement integration (MI)-infusing PA into regular classroom time-is a well-established approach to increasing elementary children's PA at school. However, less is known about MI in secondary school settings. This scoping review maps the breadth of empirical evidence on MI in secondary schools.
methodsThis review adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across seven electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, ERIC [EBSCOhost], SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PsycINFO) from November 10-15, 2023, and on August 5, 2025. Inclusion criteria centered on studies involving secondary school students and professionals. Exclusions applied to non-typically developing children and unpublished documents.
resultsMI strategies varied, with non-academic movement breaks (31 instances) and academic subject integration (28 instances) being the most common. The review included 44 studies published between 2014 and 2025. The studies originated from 11 countries and involved 59,973 participants. Two theoretical perspectives were prominent: social cognitive theory and the socio-ecological model. Methodological approaches included quantitative (28 studies), qualitative (10 studies), and mixed-methods (six studies) designs. Knowledge claims underscored student-centered benefits, the importance of contextual and institutional alignment, the feasibility and challenges of implementation, the adaptability of content for pedagogical integration, and the fact that no single MI strategy is universally sufficient for success.
conclusionsMI in secondary schools presents a viable PA promotion strategy for adolescents. Future research on MI in secondary school settings is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.