Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41672069›Full record

ArticleCell reports methods2026

Predictive modeling of molecular activity underlying physical cell-cell interactions.

Tamjeed Azad, Sarah K Walker, Gabriel D Victora, Yuri Pritykin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tamjeed AzadDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Sarah K WalkerLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Gabriel D VictoraLaboratory of Lymphocyte Dynamics, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Yuri PritykinDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. Electronic address: pritykin@princeton.edu.

Funding

Regulatory genomics of T cells in mouse and humanDP2AI171161 · NIAID · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Yury Pritykin · 2022 to 2026
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS DP2 AI171161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions between cells are central to tissue organization and function in health and disease. Labeling immune partnerships by sortagging intercellular contacts (LIPSTIC) quantitatively measures direct physical cell-cell interactions. Combined with single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), it jointly profiles cell interaction intensities and intracellular transcriptomes. Here, we present group lasso on scRNA-seq (Gloss), a predictive modeling framework that systematically links gene and pathway activity to LIPSTIC-measured interaction strength. Across multiple datasets and benchmarks, Gloss outperforms correlation-based and standard regression approaches while remaining interpretable. We apply Gloss to characterize molecular features of myeloid-T cell interactions during anti-Ctla4 immunotherapy in mouse tumors and to describe interactions between different T cell subpopulations during viral infection. Gloss provides a general computational framework for analyzing LIPSTIC+scRNA-seq data and prioritizing genes and pathways driving cellular communication.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationAnimalsHumansMiceSingle-Cell AnalysisSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisTranscriptomecell-cell interactionsCP: computational biologyCP: systems biologygroup lassoLIPSTICmachine learningproximity labelingscRNA-seqsingle-cell transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID41672069
PMCPMC12946745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.