Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41672025›Full record

ArticleESMO open2026

Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for early breast cancer.

A Grinshpun, D Dustin, M Cai, M Hughes, M DiLullo, M Moore, D Yardley, I A Mayer, W F Symmans, E L Mayer and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02764541 (Palbociclib and Endocrine Therapy for LObular Breast Cancer Preoperative Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02764541 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Palbociclib and Endocrine Therapy for LObular Breast Cancer Preoperative Study (PELOPS): A Randomized Phase II Study of Palbociclib With Letrozole Versus Letrozole Alone for Invasive Lobular Carcinoma and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2016 to 2031Enrolled195ConditionsBreast CancerArmsLetrozole, Tamoxifen, Palbociclib, Endocrine Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

A GrinshpunMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
D DustinGuardant Health, Palo Alto, USA.
M CaiGuardant Health, Palo Alto, USA.
M HughesMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA.
M DiLulloMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA.
M MooreMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA.
D YardleySarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, USA.
I A MayerVanderbilt-Ingram Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA.
W F SymmansUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
E L MayerMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
E P WinerYale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA.
N U LinMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
S M TolaneyMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
O MetzgerMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
R JeselsohnMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. Electronic address: rinath_jeselsohn@dfci.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is used in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer to reduce tumor burden before surgery. However, robust biomarkers to predict benefit from NET are lacking. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe evaluated the potential of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) before treatment and the dynamics during NET to guide treatment decisions for patients receiving NET. In this retrospective analysis, ctDNA before and after NET from patients enrolled in the phase II PELOPS trial, was assessed using the tissue-free Guardant Reveal assay.

resultsctDNA was detected at the pre-NET timepoint in 37.5% of patients (18/48) and 13.6% (6/44) of patients following NET. Pre-NET ctDNA detection was associated with higher pathological stage and higher residual cancer burden scores after NET. Patients with persistent ctDNA detected pre-surgery had a higher risk of distant recurrence.

conclusionsTaken together, these results support the potential of ctDNA to predict tumor burden before surgery after NET and provide insights into long-term prognosis. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02764541.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNANeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAbiomarkersbreast cancerctDNAneoadjuvant endocrine therapyprognosisrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID41672025
PMCPMC12914406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.