ArticleMolecular genetics and metabolism2026
A novel patient-Centered approach to clinical trial readiness in rare diseases: Application in Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome (AGS).
Article in Molecular genetics and metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Natural Product-Derived Vesicles in Nanotherapeutics.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAicardi-Goutières Syndrome (AGS) is a genetic type 1 interferonopathy that causes white matter abnormalities and intracranial calcifications, resulting in varying degrees of neurologic impairment and systemic manifestations. Novel disease-modifying therapies for AGS are forthcoming. The 2022 Food and Drug Administration guidance, "Patient-Focused Drug Development" (PFDD), emphasizes the importance of including patients' voices early in the design of clinical trials. This represents an urgent unmet need in rare disease research. In this study, we propose and pilot a new methodology to identify patient-centered Concepts of Interest (COIs) and suitable Clinical Outcome Assessments (COAs) for clinical trials.
methodsThe study was performed under the Myelin Disease Biorepository Project within the Global Leukodystrophy Initiative Clinical Trial Network. A sequential multicomponent approach, piloted in AGS, was designed to (i) identify COIs, (ii) select COAs capable of measuring the COIs through expert consensus, and (iii) assess the feasibility of COA application. Experts were identified based on relevant scientific publications and expertise in AGS (disease experts for COI) and/or their application of relevant COAs (outcome experts for COA). Expert consensus was achieved using the modified eDelphi approach for COIs, expertise-specific multi-panel focus group discussions, and pre-and post-surveys for COA selection. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement among the experts. This was followed by a virtual stakeholder discussion with patients and/or patient representatives to assess the feasibility of the COA application in the context of a clinical trial.
resultsBased on the health priorities identified by patient caregivers, the proposed approach revealed a set of fit-for-purpose COIs across the motor, adaptive behavior, and neurologic functional domains. All experts acknowledged the significance of each caregiver-identified priority but expressed differing opinions on the likelihood of observing changes in the functional domain within a 6- to 12-month timeframe. Following this, a consensus-building approach for COA selection for each identified COI resulted in a paired COI-COA panel applicable to future AGS clinical trials. Finally, the discussion on the feasibility of application of the selected COAs with the patients and/or patient representatives elicited critical information to design a patient-centered prospective COA protocol, applicable to clinical trials and natural history studies. DISCUSSION: The proposed approach marks the first step toward a patient-centered clinical trial design for rare diseases. It establishes a paired COI-COA panel, as well as informs the design of a patient-centered prospective COA protocol for upcoming AGS clinical trials and natural history studies. Additionally, the identified COA panel facilitates the creation of a multicomponent endpoint for clinical trials, which is especially crucial in phenotypically diverse disorders like AGS. This approach is widely applicable across leukodystrophies and rare diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.