ArticleSleep medicine2026
Evaluation of an automated sleep apnea scoring algorithm via the Wesper Lab home sleep apnea test.
Article in Sleep medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for sleep-disordered breathing: a taxonomy of methods, data modalities, and clinical applications.Frontiers in sleep · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the performance of the Wesper Lab home sleep apnea test (HSAT) artificial intelligence (AI) automated scoring algorithm under both in-laboratory and real-world conditions. We conducted a multi-tiered validation using two datasets and three analyses. The primary analysis compared apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and central apnea index (CAI) from Wesper Lab HSATs with simultaneous polysomnography (PSG) scored by blinded technologists (n = 44). The secondary analysis evaluated blinded scoring of raw Wesper Lab signals from the same 44 patients: first by a single scorer, then by two additional scorers to assess inter-scorer consistency. The tertiary analysis examined clinical HSATs (n = 139) in which algorithm-derived AHI was compared with expert rescoring across 11 independent clinics. Agreement metrics included Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and confusion matrices. Primary analysis: the algorithm showed strong correlation with PSG for AHI (r = 0.90) and CAI (r = 0.82) with minimal bias on Bland-Altman analysis. Secondary analysis: the correlation was r = 0.95 with minimal bias. Across three scorers, correlation remained ≥0.93. Tertiary analysis: correlation was r = 0.98 with minimal bias. These findings demonstrate that the Wesper Lab autoscoring algorithm is a reliable tool for obstructive sleep apnea and central apnea event detection, supporting its role as an HSAT platform that enhances accessibility to sleep apnea diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.