ArticleBlood cancer discovery2026
Prognostic Model Combining Mutational and Cytogenetic Profiles in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Venetoclax and Hypomethylating Agents.
Article in Blood cancer discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Venetoclax (VEN) combined with hypomethylating agents (HMA) improves outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, yet overall survival (OS) remains variable. We analyzed 506 patients with AML treated with first-line HMA/VEN at Moffitt Cancer Center to develop a genetics-based prognostic model. In multivariate analysis, mutations in TP53, KRAS, JAK2, U2AF1, CBL, and cytogenetic lesions del(7q)/-7, del(17p)/-17/i(17q), del(20q), and MECOM rearrangements predicted inferior OS, whereas IDH1/2 mutations were favorable. A point-based system stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with median OS of 54.2, 22.3, and 7.5 months, respectively [P < 0.0001; concordance index (C-index) 0.648]. External validation (n = 126) retained prognostic separation (median OS 24.7, 17.4, and 4.3 months, P = 0.0005; C-index 0.626). Compared with existing HMA/VEN-specific models, our model demonstrated superior low- versus intermediate-risk discrimination (31.9-month separation, P = 0.002; hazard ratio = 0.45, P = 0.003), with a comparable C-index. Our model supports personalized risk stratification for HMA/VEN-treated AML, pending broader validation. SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies key mutational and cytogenetic markers associated with treatment response and OS in patients with AML receiving HMA/VEN therapy. By integrating these genetic markers, our new prognostic model offers improved risk stratification, guiding personalized treatment strategies for patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. See related commentary by Lachowiez and Loghavi, p. 339.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.