ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2026
The Gendered Mediation Effects of Social Support on Fertility Intentions Among Childless Adults of Reproductive Age in China: National Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reproductive concerns and quality of life among Chinese women undergoing fertility-sparing surgery for gynecologic malignancies: a mixed-methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Fertility Social Mentality Scale for Women of Childbearing Age: a scale development study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: China is currently facing a low fertility rate, making it crucial to explore the influence of psychosocial factors on fertility intentions to address demographic structural challenges. Social support, as a potentially significant influencing factor, is not yet fully understood in terms of its specific pathways and gender differences. Objective: This study aimed to explore how social support impacts fertility intentions among Chinese adults aged 20-49 years, with an emphasis on gender-specific differences and the mediating roles of self-efficacy and conscientiousness. Methods: Data were obtained from the Psychology and Behavior Investigation of Chinese Residents (PBICR). This study included 2653 childless adults of reproductive age. A decision tree model was used to identify key factors influencing fertility intentions. A mediation analysis was conducted to explore the mediating effects of self-efficacy and conscientiousness while controlling for demographic confounders. Results: Among all 2653 participants, 71.3% (1892/2653) had fertility intentions. The proportion was significantly higher in men (weighted 79%, 95% CI 76.5%-81.3%) than in women (weighted 64.5%, 95% CI 61.8-67.1; P<.001). Participants with fertility intentions had a higher total social support score (mean 61.25, SD 14.02 vs mean 58.23, SD 13.01; P=.001). For women, family support significantly influenced fertility intentions, whereas support from friends was more relevant for men. Mediation analysis revealed that for men, self-efficacy significantly mediated the relationship between social support and fertility intention, with an indirect effect of 0.06 (95% CI 0.04-0.09; P=.001) and a mediation proportion of 52.54%. For women, conscientiousness played a significant mediating role, with an indirect effect of 0.011 (95% CI 0.002-0.018; P=.001) and a mediation proportion of 10.25%. Conclusions: Enhancing targeted social support can increase fertility intentions, with implications for addressing demographic challenges. Tailored policies should prioritize providing family support and fostering conscientiousness for women, while boosting self-efficacy and friend-based social support for men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.