ArticleCBE life sciences education2026
The Fourth Credit Hour: How do we Teach in Biology Discussion Sections?
Article in CBE life sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discussion sections are scheduled course meetings led by a teaching assistant (TA). Goals of these meetings may include: providing additional content practice, access to instructional support, and promoting a student's sense of belonging. As such, sections ideally include smaller groups of students and involve active learning. However, little is known about broad patterns in discussion section instruction and student experiences. To characterize student experiences in discussion sections, we surveyed ∼5000 students enrolled in 19 different biology courses covering 193 discussion sections at one institution in spring and fall 2023. Discussion sections varied in size (32 - 400 + students) and modality, with students participating either in-person or remotely. Students in remote discussion sections reported receiving significantly higher amounts of lecture from TAs compared with students in in-person sections, and these shifts in activity significantly modified their sense of belonging. Inductive thematic analysis of qualitative responses identified several themes regarding aspects of discussion sections that students felt were helpful (e.g., increased access to support) or unhelpful (e.g., environments not conducive to learning). Our findings offer insights into the different ways discussion sections are used in large biology programs and provide data to inform future discussion section design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.