Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41671418›Full record

ArticleHealth care management review

Team creativity as a catalyst for care effectiveness and well-being in primary care teams.

Yuna S H Lee, Nancy LaVine, Cheryl Rathert, Yulia Kogan, Lusine Poghosyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management review. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nancy LaVine
Cheryl Rathert
Yulia Kogan
Lusine Poghosyan

Funding

AHRQ HHS 5R03HS027502-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care teams play a critical role in delivering high-quality, patient-centered care, yet they face mounting challenges, including high rates of burnout and job dissatisfaction. Creativity within teams may serve as a key resource for fostering continuous improvement and innovation while simultaneously enhancing team members' well-being. PURPOSE: This study introduces team creativity as a novel and actionable teamwork construct, assessing its relationship with burnout, job satisfaction, and perceived effectiveness of care delivery. We validate a new multidimensional measure of team creativity tailored to the primary care context. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Using survey data from 648 primary care team members across a large health system, we conducted confirmatory factor analysis to validate the Primary Care Team Creativity tool. We then tested hypotheses to assess associations between primary care team creativity, perceived effectiveness of care delivery, and well-being.

resultsFindings confirm the validity of the Primary Care Team Creativity tool. Primary care team creativity was positively associated with job satisfaction and negatively associated with burnout. Perceived effectiveness of care delivery mediated these relationships, indicating that creativity enhances well-being by improving team members' perceptions of the quality of care they provide.

conclusionThis study establishes team creativity as a validated, actionable construct in primary care and demonstrates its potential for enhancing care effectiveness, reducing burnout and enhancing job satisfaction for primary care professionals. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health care leaders can foster team creativity by embedding structured opportunities for idea generation, encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration, and leveraging creativity to enhance care processes-ultimately supporting both innovation and provider well-being in primary care.

Indexed as

CreativityPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareAdultBurnout, ProfessionalFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedPsychological Well-BeingQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesBurnoutcare qualitycreativityjob satisfactionprimary careteams

Identifiers

PMID41671418
PMCPMC12922685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.