Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41671354›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Octopamine and tyramine dynamics predict learning rate phenotypes during associative conditioning in honey bees.

Lester P Sands, Hong Lei, Seth R Batten, Alec Hartle, Terry Lohrenz, Leonardo Barbosa, Dan Bang, Peter Dayan, William M Howe, Brian H Smith and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lester P SandsFralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia 24016, USA.
Hong LeiSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5619-3097
Seth R BattenFralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia 24016, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8147-4301
Alec HartleFralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia 24016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4089-5473
Terry LohrenzFralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia 24016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1581-0765
Leonardo BarbosaFralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia 24016, USA.
Dan BangFralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia 24016, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7446-7090
Peter DayanMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tubingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3476-1839
William M HoweFralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia 24016, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0433-6591
Brian H SmithSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7018-8561
Pendleton R MontagueFralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia 24016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8967-0339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biogenic amines are fundamental for physiological homeostasis and behavioral control in both vertebrates and invertebrates. Monoamine neurotransmitters released in target brain regions conjointly regulate adaptive learning and plasticity. However, our understanding of these multianalyte mechanisms remains nascent, in part due to limitations in measurement technology. Here, during associative conditioning in honey bees, we concurrently tracked subsecond fluctuations in octopamine, tyramine, dopamine, and serotonin in the antennal lobe, where plasticity influences odorant representations. By repeatedly pairing an odorant with subsequent sucrose delivery, we observed individual differences in the conditioned response to odor, which occurred after a variable number of pairings (learners) or not at all (non-learners). The distinction between learners and non-learners was reflected in neurotransmitter responses across experimental conditions. The speed of learning, the number of pairings prior to a proboscis extension reflex, could be predicted from monoamine opponent signaling (octopamine-tyramine), from both the first presentation of the odorant alone, prior to any pairing with sucrose, and the first conditioned response to the odorant, coming after a number of sucrose pairings. These results suggest that monoamine signaling phenotypes may relate directly to the now widely reported socially relevant genetic differences in honey bee learning.

Indexed as

LearningOctopamineTyramineAnimalsBeesConditioning, ClassicalDopamineOdorantsPhenotypeSerotoninDopamineOctopamineSerotoninTyramine

Identifiers

PMID41671354
PMCPMC12893229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.