ArticlePLoS pathogens2026
Interferon-β induction heterogeneity during KSHV infection is correlated to levels and activation of the transcription factors ATF2 and RelA, and not IRF3.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell heterogeneity in interferon induction potential is heritable and governed by variation in cell state.Cell systems · 2026Article
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2/KDR) Promotes KSHV Lytic Replication and Drives Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Release and Cancer Signaling.Journal of medical virology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Careful regulation of type I interferons (IFN) like IFN-β is vital for balancing tissue damage and protection against infections. Heterogeneity in type I IFN expression among virally infected cells is a common phenomenon that may help limit IFN responses, but the source of this heterogeneity is poorly understood. We previously found that during Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus replication, type I IFN induction was limited to a small percentage of infected cells. This heterogeneity was not explained by viral gene expression. Here, we used a fluorescent reporter and fluorescence activated cell sorting to investigate the source of the heterogeneity. Surprisingly, the canonical IFN induction pathway culminating in the activation of the IRF3 transcription factor was similarly activated between cells that made high vs. low/no IFN-β. In contrast, the activation or expression of the two other IFN transcription factors, the NF-κB subunit RelA and the AP-1 subunit ATF2, correlated with IFN-β induction. Our results suggest that during viral infection, activation of IRF3 does not automatically result in IFN responses at the level of individual cells, but that other factors, such as NF-κB and AP-1, are limiting for type I IFN induction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.