ArticlePloS one2026
Caste and tobacco use: Decomposing inequalities using Global Adult Tobacco Survey, India.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndia ranks second globally in tobacco consumption, with marked disparities across socially stratified caste groups. Despite tobacco control efforts, Scheduled Tribes (ST) and Scheduled Castes (SC)-historically marginalized communities-exhibit elevated tobacco use. This study examines caste-based disparities in smoked and smokeless tobacco (SLT) use and identifies factors contributing to these inequalities.
methodsWe analyzed nationally representative data from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) 2016-17, comprising 74,037 adults aged ≥15 years. Social groups were classified as ST, SC, Other Backward Classes (OBC), and General categories. We estimated prevalence rates, used multivariable logistic regression to assess associations with socio-demographic factors, and employed multivariate decomposition analysis to quantify contributors to inter-group disparities.
resultsOverall tobacco use prevalence was 28.6%, with substantial variation: ST (36.0%), SC (28.9%), OBC (29.1%), and General (23.1%). SLT use was particularly high among ST (27.7%) and SC (20.7%) compared to General (16.0%). Men had 16-fold higher odds of SLT use (AOR: 16.4; 95%CI:15.2-17.7) and 23-fold higher odds of smoking [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 23.1; 95%CI:20.8-25.6] compared to women, with similar patterns within each social group. Lower education, older age, disrupted marriage, rural residence, and poor wealth status were independently associated with higher tobacco use. Decomposition analyses revealed that sex (38%), education (24%), and region (18%) explained most between-group differences, with substantial tobacco use concentrated in Eastern, Central, and Northeastern states.
conclusionsPronounced caste-based tobacco use disparities persist in India, disproportionately affecting socioeconomically disadvantaged ST and SC populations, particularly older, less-educated in rural areas. Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3.a requires targeted interventions addressing these structural inequalities through culturally appropriate cessation programs, enhanced health education, and region-specific tobacco control policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.