Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41671295›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

A comparative study of statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in spatial transcriptomics.

Yishan Wang, Chenxuan Zang, Ziyi Li, Charles C Guo, Dejian Lai, Peng Wei

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yishan WangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Chenxuan ZangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Ziyi LiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Charles C GuoDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Dejian LaiDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Peng WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7758-6116

Funding

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Hepatocellular CarcinomaP50CA217674 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI YAO, JAMES C · 2019 to 2023
$11.3M
Project 3: Identifying Molecular Vulnerabilities to Improve Interferon Gene Therapy in Bladder CancerP01CA296429 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Peng Wei · 2025 to 2026
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA296429NCI NIH HHS P50 CA217674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) provides unprecedented insights into gene expression patterns while retaining spatial context, making it a valuable tool for understanding complex tissue architectures, such as those found in cancers. Seurat, by far the most popular tool for analyzing ST data, uses the Wilcoxon rank-sum test by default for differential expression analysis. However, as a nonparametric method that disregards spatial correlations, the Wilcoxon test can lead to inflated false positive rates and misleading findings. This limitation highlights the need for a more robust statistical approach that effectively incorporates spatial correlations. To this end, we propose a Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) framework as a robust solution for differential gene expression analysis in ST. We conducted a comprehensive comparison of the GEE-based tests with existing methods, including the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and z-test. By appropriately accounting for spatial correlations, extensive simulations showed that the GEE test with robust standard error, referred to as the Independent GEE, demonstrated superior Type I error control and comparable power relative to other methods. Applications to ST datasets from breast and prostate cancer showed poor calibration of the p-values and potential false positive findings from the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Our comparative study based on simulations and real data applications suggests that the Independent GEE test is well-suited for ST data, offering more accurate identification of biologically relevant gene expression changes and complementing the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. We have implemented the proposed method in R package "SpatialGEE", available on GitHub.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSpatial TranscriptomicsTranscriptomeAlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationFemaleHumansModels, StatisticalProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID41671295
PMCPMC12912703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.