Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41671241›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Well-being of health workers providing maternal and newborn care: A qualitative evidence synthesis.

Alya Hazfiarini, Martha Vazquez Corona, Nicole Minckas, Caroline S E Homer, Tari Turner, Rana Islamiah Zahroh, Patience A Afulani, Giorgio Cometto, Steve McDonald, Charlotte E Warren and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alya HazfiariniGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2097-0245
Martha Vazquez CoronaGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2061-9540
Nicole MinckasGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2650-443X
Caroline S E HomerWomen, Children and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-3011
Tari TurnerSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7990-1623
Rana Islamiah ZahrohGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-2336
Patience A AfulaniDepartment of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6739-234X
Giorgio ComettoHeath Workforce, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Steve McDonaldSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2832-5205
Charlotte E WarrenPopulation Council Inc, New York, NY, United States of America.
Özge TunçalpInstitute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-682X
Anayda PortelaDepartment of Sexual, Reproductive, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6368-1585
Meghan A BohrenGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-4682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health workers providing maternal and newborn care can experience burnout and emotional distress, which harms their well-being and, consequently, their ability to deliver respectful care. The World Health Organization (WHO) Compendium on respectful maternal and newborn care identifies health workers' well-being as a critical area for intervention, but no specific definition or domains of well-being exist for this group. We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis to synthesise key domains of well-being for health workers providing maternal and newborn care, by exploring health workers' perceptions and experiences about their well-being. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL and MIDIRS from 2010 to 20 August 2025 to identify studies reporting health workers' perceptions and experiences of well-being while providing routine maternal and newborn care in any context. Using maximum variation purposive sampling, we sampled papers for data extraction. Thematic synthesis was employed for analysis, with GRADE-CERQual assessing confidence in findings. A mixed inductive-deductive approach informed the development of well-being domains. Potential implementation strategies to improve well-being were developed using Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B); and Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Consultations with health workers validated findings and implementation strategies. We analysed 51 papers from five WHO regions, except the South-East Asia Region, with 61% from high-income and 39% from low-middle-income countries. We identified 18 findings on factors influencing health workers' well-being. Eight key domains of well-being identified: 1) physical health and access to care and support, 2) emotional and psychological health and access to care and support, 3) fair, safe, and supportive environment, 4) fair and equitable remuneration, 5) adequate housing and a safe community, 6) strong professional identity, 7) positive relationship with women and their families, and 8) work and personal life harmony. The TDF, COM-B, and BCW mapping suggest that interventions should address motivation and external influences.

Identifiers

PMID41671241
PMCPMC12893595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.