Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41671235›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Earliest geometries: A cognitive investigation of Howiesons Poort engraved ostrich eggshells.

Valentina Decembrini, Ludovica Ottaviano, Mattia Cartolano, Enza Elena Spinapolice, Silvia Ferrara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valentina DecembriniDepartment of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3088-9287
Ludovica OttavianoDepartment of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Mattia CartolanoDepartment of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Enza Elena SpinapoliceDepartment of Ancient World Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Silvia FerraraDepartment of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-7666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents the first quantitative geometric and spatial analysis of engraved ostrich eggshell (EOES) fragments from the Howiesons Poort (HP) technocomplex of the African late Middle Stone Age (MSA), to evaluate whether the EOES demonstrates genuine formal structuring and visuo-spatial organization. By considering their 'non-accidental properties'-such as curvature, parallelism, and co-termination-which remain consistent across different viewpoints, as well as their metric properties, including angular inclinations, based on empirical thresholds, we show that the HP dataset systematically employs salient geometric features. These features are combined and embedded through complex cognitive operations, including the iteration and alignment of parallel lines, rotation of lines generating intersections with variable angular openings, and translation of specific elements nested within organized spatial layouts. These engravings therefore constitute an early material expression of complex graphic representation, attesting to a species-specific human capacity for organizing geometric thought. Overall, the patterns reflect a system of rules through which Homo sapiens in the HP organized visual forms, revealing the cognitive foundations of structured graphic behavior.

Indexed as

CognitionEgg ShellEngraving and EngravingsFossilsStruthioniformesAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41671235
PMCPMC12893581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.