ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Bacterial iron acquisition by
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iron acquisition by amino acids under flow.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of virulence and resistance gene profiles between carbapenem-resistant and ESBL-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In natural environments, bacteria often encounter low concentrations of nutrient mixtures that are continuously replenished by physical processes such as fluid flow. Studying bacterial physiology under such conditions is experimentally challenging because it is difficult to maintain steady, low nutrient concentrations with rapid renewal. Most studies on nutrient limitation have used approaches such as the chemostat, which rely on long renewal times to sustain low concentrations. We developed a Millifluidic Continuous Culture Device (MCCD), inspired by microfluidics, that enables bacterial cultivation in nutrient mixtures at low micromolar concentrations with rapid renewal driven by fluid flow. Unlike microfluidic systems, the MCCD retains sufficient culture volume to support batch-scale 'omic analyses. Using the MCCD, we cultured
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.