Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41671173›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2026

Shared stream-lake patterns in diversity, rRNA-based activity and community assembly of bacteria and microeukaryotes under distinct hydrological regimes.

Sofia Papadopoulou, Eva S Lindström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sofia PapadopoulouDepartment of Ecology and Genetics/Limnology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18 D, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7315-3671
Eva S LindströmDepartment of Ecology and Genetics/Limnology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18 D, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8920-3071

Funding

Swedish Research Council 2020-03110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshwater systems are shaped by hydrological connectivity, yet distinct microbial communities persist between lotic and lentic habitats. While bacterial biogeography across aquatic habitats has been widely explored, less is known about the spatiotemporal links of microeukaryotes to bacterial communities. Here, we investigated microbial diversity, rRNA-based activity and community assembly within a stream-lake network in Sweden under contrasting hydrological regimes. Using amplicon sequencing of both rRNA genes and transcripts, we found parallel patterns in bacterial and microeukaryotic alpha and beta diversity, with lower richness in lakes than in inlet streams. Bacterial phenotypic diversity, assessed by flow cytometry, captured biogeographic trends comparable to sequencing-based methods. Bacteria and microeukaryotes also appeared to be structured by similar assembly mechanisms, with environmental selection having a higher relative importance in lakes compared to streams. During low-flow periods, the catchment outlet became increasingly distinct from upstream communities, demonstrating dispersal limitation from lakes. Finally, phantom taxa, undetected in rRNA genes, were predominantly rare and exhibited disproportionately high RNA: DNA ratios compared to active taxa, underscoring the need for their careful handling. Our findings revealed habitat-driven microbial dynamics, despite pronounced seasonal shifts in hydrology.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiodiversityEukaryotaLakesRiversEcosystemHydrologyRNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwedenRNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16Saquatic microbial communitiesbiogeographycommunity assemblycytometric diversityDNA ratiophantom taxaRNA

Identifiers

PMID41671173
PMCPMC12923169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.