ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2026
Phyllosphere microbiomes uncovered: Research trends, geographic disparities, and key microbial players.
Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, significant efforts have been made to understand the phyllosphere microbiome. To clarify current research trends and identify knowledge gaps, we conducted a systematic review of the literature and investigated the methodologies used to analyze microbiome communities associated with plants, along with the objectives of these studies. Applying systematic review principles, we assessed 333 reports from the Web of Science database for eligibility. Articles were included if they presented original research on microbiomes associated with phyllosphere tissues identified by next-generation sequencing. Of these, 268 reports, published from 2009 to March 2025, were retrieved. These reports were used to extract data in a controlled and methodical manner. The analyses identified the most frequently studied plant species and primary tissues, the geographical locations sampled, the variables investigated in the phyllosphere microbiome, and the methodologies and tools employed. A comparison of the number of studies on below-ground (n=1562) versus above-ground tissue (n=375) underscores the relatively unexplored nature of above-ground research. We notice a surprisingly low number of studies from the Southern Hemisphere. Additionally, through data mining, we identify the most dominant bacteria and fungi reported in phyllosphere studies. Based on these findings, we offer recommendations for future research on the phyllosphere.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.