Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41670994›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Prevalence of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Latino Adults Following the Medicaid Eligibility Amendment Expansion.

Nathalie Huguet, Jorge Kaufmann, Heather Holderness, Jeremy Erroba, Gretchen Mertes, Teresa Schmidt, Miguel Marino, John Heintzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathalie HuguetDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
Jorge KaufmannDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
Heather HoldernessDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
Jeremy ErrobaDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
Gretchen MertesDepartment of Innovation and Improvement, OCHIN, Portland, Oregon.
Teresa SchmidtDepartment of Innovation and Improvement, OCHIN, Portland, Oregon.
Miguel MarinoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
John HeintzmanDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cancer is the leading cause of death for Latino and Latina individuals in the US. Lack of insurance is one of the leading contributing factors to low prevalence of colorectal cancer screening. In 2021, the state Medicaid coverage programs in California and Oregon were amended to expand income-based eligibility for Medicaid to adults aged 50 years or older regardless of immigration status. Objective: To evaluate whether expanding Medicaid eligibility regardless of immigration status to adults aged 50 years or older with low income was associated with improvements in the prevalence of up-to-date colorectal cancer screening among Latino and Latina patients who received care at community health centers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective case-control study used electronic health record data from clinics from January 2018 to December 2023 in states that expanded Medicaid eligibility regardless of immigration status by 2021 (California and Oregon) and from those that did not amend their eligibility (Indiana, Minnesota, Ohio, and Washington). The dataset included Latino and Latina patients aged 50 to 63 years who were uninsured at baseline and had visits both before (2018-2019) and after (2021-2023) the Medicaid eligibility amendment (excluding 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic and its association with primary care delivery). Exposure: State adoption of the 2021 Medicaid income-based eligibility amendment regardless of immigration status to adults aged 50 years or older. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prevalence of up-to-date colorectal cancer screening was assessed using a doubly robust covariate-adjusted difference-in-differences model to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). Results: There were 6503 Latino and Latina patients (mean [SD] age, 54.04 [3.32] years; 3623 females [55.7%]) from 218 clinics included in the study, of whom 5957 (91.6%) preferred the Spanish language. The prevalence (in percentage points) of colorectal cancer screening increased among uninsured English-preferring Latino and Latina patients (ATT = 19.53 [95% CI, 9.04-30.02]), English-preferring Latino men (ATT = 16.72 [95% CI, 1.27-32.16]) when considering all 3 years of the posteligibility period, and Spanish-preferring Latina women (ATT = 8.58 [95% CI, 1.48-15.67]) in the third posteligibility year in eligibility amendment states more than their counterparts in nonamendment states. Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study of Latino and Latina patients, expansion of Medicaid eligibility was associated with significantly higher prevalence of colorectal cancer screening rates among Spanish-preferring Latina women and English-preferring Latino and Latina patients. The findings suggest that state-funded coverage expansions may help increase colorectal cancer-screening prevalences in this population.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEligibility DeterminationHispanic or LatinoMedicaidCaliforniaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOregonPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41670994
PMCPMC12895285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.