ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Surgeons' practices and preferences for performing right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer: results from the SuPrHem survey.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical techniques for right hemicolectomy (RHC) show considerable heterogeneity. To identify potential areas for improvement and standardization, the objective of this survey was to evaluate and report current practices and preferences among surgeons for performing RHC for colorectal cancer. An international online survey consisting of 31 questions was distributed to general surgeons worldwide to assess their preferred techniques for performing RHC. A total of 368 surgeons from 48 countries responded. Among them, 47% reported performing at least 90% of RHC laparoscopically, while 40% used a robotic approach. The most common dissection technique was a medial-to-lateral vessel-first approach, used by 82.3% of respondents. During laparoscopic procedures, 51.6% of surgeons performed extracorporeal anastomosis, whereas 82.9% of those using a robotic approach favored intracorporeal anastomosis. Fluorescence angiography was routinely used by 39.9% of respondents. The Pfannenstiel incision was the most frequently selected extraction site (46.5%) especially if intracorporeal anastomosis was performed (81.8%). The preferred technique for performing RHC includes a laparoscopic approach with intracorporeal lymph node dissection and extracorporeal anastomosis. Most RHC procedures therefore remain laparoscopy-assisted rather than fully minimally invasive. Robotic surgery appears to facilitate a fully minimally invasive approach including intracorporeal anastomosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41670923What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.