Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41670923›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2026

Surgeons' practices and preferences for performing right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer: results from the SuPrHem survey.

Pierre-Alain Tokoto, Elin Meyer, Eleftherios Gialamas, Guillaume Meurette, Emilie Liot, Justin Davies, Frédéric Ris, SuPrHem Collaborative Group, Jeremy Meyer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pierre-Alain TokotoDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6892-1231
Elin MeyerDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Eleftherios GialamasDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Guillaume MeuretteDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Emilie LiotDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Justin DaviesCambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Frédéric RisDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
SuPrHem Collaborative Group
Jeremy MeyerDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland. jeremy.meyer@hcuge.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical techniques for right hemicolectomy (RHC) show considerable heterogeneity. To identify potential areas for improvement and standardization, the objective of this survey was to evaluate and report current practices and preferences among surgeons for performing RHC for colorectal cancer. An international online survey consisting of 31 questions was distributed to general surgeons worldwide to assess their preferred techniques for performing RHC. A total of 368 surgeons from 48 countries responded. Among them, 47% reported performing at least 90% of RHC laparoscopically, while 40% used a robotic approach. The most common dissection technique was a medial-to-lateral vessel-first approach, used by 82.3% of respondents. During laparoscopic procedures, 51.6% of surgeons performed extracorporeal anastomosis, whereas 82.9% of those using a robotic approach favored intracorporeal anastomosis. Fluorescence angiography was routinely used by 39.9% of respondents. The Pfannenstiel incision was the most frequently selected extraction site (46.5%) especially if intracorporeal anastomosis was performed (81.8%). The preferred technique for performing RHC includes a laparoscopic approach with intracorporeal lymph node dissection and extracorporeal anastomosis. Most RHC procedures therefore remain laparoscopy-assisted rather than fully minimally invasive. Robotic surgery appears to facilitate a fully minimally invasive approach including intracorporeal anastomosis.

Indexed as

ColectomyColorectal NeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Physicians'SurgeonsAnastomosis, SurgicalHumansLaparoscopyLymph Node ExcisionRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurveys and QuestionnairesColorectal cancerLaparoscopyMinimally invasive surgeryMISRobotic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.