Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41670910›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2026

Sustained Efficacy of Eptinezumab in Participants with Migraine for Whom Prior Preventive Treatments Failed and Who Self-reported Psychiatric Comorbidities: Post Hoc Analysis of the Placebo-controlled DELIVER Trial.

Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Cristina Tassorelli, Line Pickering Boserup, Susanne F Awad, Xin Ying Lee, Jessica Ailani

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04418765 (Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study With an Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine in Patients With Unsuccessful Prior Preventive Treatments), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04418765 phase3completednot on this map

Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study With an Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine in Patients With Unsuccessful Prior Preventive Treatments

TypeinterventionalSponsorH. Lundbeck A/SRan2020 to 2022Enrolled892ConditionsMigraineArmsEptinezumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patricia Pozo-RosichHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0796-4702
Cristina TassorelliDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1513-2113
Line Pickering BoserupH. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3062-8881
Susanne F AwadH. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark. SUAW@lundbeck.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5060-7404
Xin Ying LeeH. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1102-3756
Jessica AilaniDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8106-4927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPsychiatric comorbidities increase the risk of migraine disease progression. These post hoc analyses explored whether self-reported psychiatric comorbidities at screening had an impact on the short- and long-term efficacy of eptinezumab in the DELIVER trial.

methodsDELIVER was a multinational trial that evaluated eptinezumab in adults with migraine with 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures. Participants were initially randomized to intravenous eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo every 12 weeks. Participants receiving placebo during the 24-week double-blind placebo-controlled period were switched to eptinezumab 100 mg or 300 mg for the 48-week dose-blinded extension, while those initially randomized to eptinezumab continued their assigned dose. Subgroups included participants self-reporting a psychiatric condition at screening, within which participants self-reporting a depressive condition at screening were also analyzed. Outcomes were changes from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMDs), ≥ 50% migraine responder rates (MRRs), and participants who improved per Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC; much or very improved). As post hoc analyses, no p-values were generated.

resultsOf the total population, 122/890 (13.7%) self-reported ≥ 1 psychiatric comorbidity, including 68/890 (7.6%) who self-reported depression. The mean change from baseline in MMDs over Weeks 1-12 in the psychiatric comorbidity subgroup was - 4.6 with eptinezumab versus - 0.9 with placebo, with similar mean changes observed in those with comorbid depression (eptinezumab, - 4.7; placebo, 0.0). In the psychiatric comorbidity subgroup, ≥ 50% MRRs over Weeks 1-12 were higher with eptinezumab (42%; odds ratio [OR] vs placebo = 25.3) than with placebo (3%), as were the proportions of participants with PGIC improvement (eptinezumab, 60%, OR = 6.7; placebo, 19%). During the extension period, participants switching from placebo to eptinezumab reported similar improvements to the eptinezumab-eptinezumab group, with similar outcomes in the subgroups with psychiatric comorbidities.

conclusionsPsychiatric comorbidities, including depressive conditions, did not appear to impact the short- or long-term efficacy of eptinezumab in participants with migraine for whom 2-4 prior preventive treatments had failed.

trial registrationEudraCT (2019-004497-25); ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04418765).

Indexed as

DepressionEptinezumabMigraine prophylaxisPrior failuresPsychiatric comorbidities

Identifiers

PMID41670910
PMCPMC12965942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.