ArticleLa Radiologia medica2026
Dynamic ultrasound motion metrics combined with deep learning for clinical differentiation of subacromial impingement syndrome.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatial Validation of General-Purpose Multimodal AI-Generated Target Regions in Peripheral Nerve Block Ultrasound.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis prospective study evaluated the diagnostic performance of deep learning models in predicting subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) during dynamic shoulder ultrasonography, comparing a faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN) with a self-transfer learning CNN (STL-CNN). The utility of integrating a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) for SIS classification was also examined. MATERIALS AND
methodsParticipants underwent shoulder abduction and adduction during ultrasound imaging. Faster R-CNN and STL-CNN were trained to localize anatomical landmarks, and the better-performing model was paired with a 1D-CNN to differentiate SIS. Subacromial motion metrics-including acromiohumeral distance (AHD), horizontal AHD (hAHD), and vertical AHD (vAHD)-were used as classification features.
resultsAmong 59 SIS patients and 59 controls, Faster R-CNN demonstrated significantly lower mean distance errors than STL-CNN for the greater tuberosity (0.1302 cm vs. 0.4835 cm, p = 0.03) and lateral acromion (0.0585 cm vs. 0.2634 cm, p = 0.02). vAHD yielded superior discrimination compared with AHD and hAHD. Using Faster R-CNN-derived trajectories, the 1D-CNN achieved 94% accuracy for vAHD, surpassing results based on ground-truth annotations.
conclusionFaster R-CNN enabled more accurate landmark localization than STL-CNN, while vAHD enhanced SIS identification. Combining faster R-CNN with a 1D-CNN demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, underscoring the potential of deep learning for automated SIS assessment during dynamic ultrasonography. However, the current workflow requires offline video analysis, and future advances should focus on real-time implementation and improved generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41670888What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.