ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
A lower-limb motor imagery BCI using virtual reality and novel calibration strategy in post-stroke patients.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a novel two-step calibration strategy in a Motor Imagery (MI)-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) system for lower-limb post-stroke patients rehabilitation, using electroencephalography (EEG) signals, a virtual reality serious game, and a pedal end-effector. This research proposes a novel MI feature extraction algorithm combining EEG data from pedaling MI and actual movements using k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) and probability analysis. The extracted features are used to re-calibrate the BCI system, and improve its accuracy. Initially, participants performed 20 MI trials without feedback (open-loop, Calibration Mode #1) while receiving passive movement. During this phase, EEG data were processed using the Riemannian Geometry method to train a Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) classifier. In the second step (closed-loop, Calibration Mode #2), feedback through passive movement was provided, changing the pedal’s speed according to the MI classification consistency. A chronic post-stroke patient tested the proposed BCI system, first receiving transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) before each session. The calibration strategy improved classification accuracy from 52.60% (Mode #1) to 86.74% (Mode #2). The classification remained effective throughout sessions, allowing for immediate feedback-driven training while collecting more reliable EEG MI data. The BCI developed here is able to provide post-stroke patient rehabilitation by engaging lower-limb central and peripheral mechanisms through simultaneous MI and passive pedaling during extended workout sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.