SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Emerging microsurgical techniques for facial nerve reconstruction in traumatic skull base fractures: a systematic review and comprehensive evidence analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury affects 69 million people annually, with skull base fractures causing devastating facial nerve palsy. Despite representing only 4% of cases, these injuries result in severe functional and psychosocial complications including hearing loss and cranial nerve dysfunction, presenting significant reconstructive challenges. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and examined facial reanimation surgery outcomes in skull base fracture patients through comprehensive database searches and quality appraisal. Study quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools for case reports and series, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies. Systematic searches across eight databases and registries yielded 3,682 records; 3,251 underwent screening after duplicate removal. Eighteen studies were included, documenting predominantly severe facial dysfunction, with 88.8% reporting House-Brackmann Grade VI paralysis. Surgical approaches varied considerably, including masseteric-facial nerve transfers, split hypoglossal-facial anastomosis, and complex free tissue transfers with dual innervation, reflecting evolving microsurgical techniques for functional restoration in post-traumatic skull base fracture patients. This systematic review demonstrated that facial reanimation surgery following skull base fractures improves functional outcomes, with optimal results achieved within 6–12 months post-injury. Masseteric and hypoglossal-facial nerve transfers showed favorable outcomes for severe paralysis. However, evidence remains limited, necessitating timely specialist referral, individualized surgical planning, and standardized multicenter studies to establish evidence-based guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41670832What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.