ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Long-term clinical outcomes of patients with localized primary ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Primary ocular-adnexal non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in a Peruvian cohort: An 18-year experience.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because primary ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (POAML) is rare, key clinical questions, including the best treatment strategy and the validity of watchful waiting (WW), remain unresolved. Although radiotherapy (RT) is the standard treatment for localized POAML, it is commonly associated with acute and late toxicities. Overall, 128 patients with localized POAML diagnosed and managed at our institution between 1998 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Forty-two patients were initially managed with WW, and 86 received immediate RT. During a median follow-up of 7.2 years (range 0.1-18.4), no patients died of lymphoma progression. Seven patients in the WW group experienced disease progression at the primary site. In the RT group, almost all patients (97.7%) achieved a complete response after RT; however, 12 patients relapsed. Histological transformation occurred in one patient in each group. The 10-year cumulative incidence of progression was 24.9% (95% CI, 12.6-45.7%) with WW and 13.1% (95% CI, 6.9-23.9%) with RT (p = 0.27). The rate of freedom from systemic therapy at 10 years was 89.7 and 94.8%, respectively (p = 0.67). This observational study suggests that WW is an acceptable treatment option for selected patients with localized POAML, with no significant differences in long-term outcomes compared with RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41670807What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.