ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) in paediatric surgical centres across the United Kingdom and Ireland: a collaborative research group survey.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) with Indocyanine Green (ICG) dye enhances intra-operative visualisation of anatomical structures, tissue perfusion, and lymphatic drainage. To inform future practice and collaborative research, we aim to determine current FGS use in paediatric surgical centres in the UK and Ireland (UK&I).
methodsIn November 2023, an online survey of 11 to 21 questions was disseminated to one consultant surgeon at each of the 27 UK&I paediatric surgical centres.
resultsTwenty-four of 27 centres (88.9%) responded. Fourteen centres (58.3%) never used FGS, with 7 lacking the appropriate camera. The 10 centres (41.7%) with experience reported recent, limited use, with half performing their first case less than 1 year ago; half used fluorescence on fewer than 5 occasions. The top three indications were oncological procedures, lymphatic assessment, and biliary tree visualisation. A range of ICG doses were reported. Half of the centres had no ICG protocol. Only one centre used FGS in premature neonates. 19/24 (79.2%) deemed FGS helpful or acknowledged future potential; 13/24 (54.2%) believe an FGS registry would be valuable.
conclusionsCurrent use of FGS in children is limited and non-standardised. An FGS collaborative interest group or UK&I registry could support experience-sharing and standardisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41670769What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.