Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41670762›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2026

Increasing complexity and plateauing outcomes in AO type C distal humerus fractures: a 50-year institutional case series.

Karina Hönck, Peter Wenzelburger, Nicolas Eibinger, Patrick Sadoghi, Paul Puchwein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karina HönckDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria. k.hoenck@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5708-5669
Peter WenzelburgerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Nicolas EibingerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Patrick SadoghiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Paul PuchweinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria. paul.puchwein@medunigraz.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistal humerus fractures in adults are rare but complex injuries, particularly AO type C3 fractures, often involving comminution, instability, and osteoporotic bone. Demographic trends indicate rising incidence, especially among elderly patients, with increasing functional demands challenging modern osteosynthesis. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with bicolumnar plating remains the preferred reconstructive approach, although complications remain substantial. This study aimed to evaluate trends in fracture complexity, patient demographics, and functional outcomes over five decades, focusing on the most recent cohort (2009-2018, series E) and comparing with historical cohorts (series A-D, 1969-2008).

methodsThis retrospective analysis included five consecutive 10-year institutional cohorts (series A: n = 43; B: n = 29; C: n = 47; D: n = 58) of 233 patients with 235 supradiacondylar distal humerus fractures (AO type C1-3) treated with ORIF. Functional outcome parameters (Jupiter and Cassebaum Scores) and demographic data were available for all cohorts; additional parameters (range of motion (ROM), QuickDASH Score) were available for series D and E, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Short Form (SF)-36, and strength were assessed specifically in series E (n = 56; follow-up n = 21). Cross-cohort comparisons of categorical variables used chi-square tests; continuous outcomes were summarized descriptively. Historical cohort means served as a basis for comparison, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) was applied for within-series analyses.

resultsMean patient age increased to 62.6 (range 19-89, SD ± 18.1) years in series E. The proportion of AO type C3 fractures rose significantly from 11.6% (series A) to 71.4% (series E) (p ≤ 0.05). In series E (n = 56, follow-up n = 21), ORIF with bicolumnar plating was performed in 94.6% of cases and the overall complication rate was 16.4%, with mean hospitalization time of 11.1 (range 1-40, SD ± 10.1) days, mean extension deficit of 23° (range 0-90°, SD ± 26.4°), strength loss of 25.5 N (range 0-64.7 N, SD ± 19.1 N), QuickDASH Score of 23.3 (range 0-61.4, SD ± 21.2), and mean MEPS of 83.2 (range 45-100, SD ± 17.0). Good-to-excellent results were observed in 52.6% (Jupiter) and 73.7% (Cassebaum). Subjective satisfaction remained high.

conclusionsOver five decades, distal humerus fractures increasingly involved older patients and more complex AO type C3 patterns. While ORIF continues to provide satisfactory outcomes, persistent deficits in motion and plateauing functional scores indicate that reconstructive limits may be approached in this evolving patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; Case series, treatment study.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalHumeral FracturesHumeral Fractures, DistalOpen Fracture ReductionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone PlatesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBicolumnar platingDistal humerus fractureDual plating osteosynthesisElbow arthoplastySupradiacondylar humerus fracture

Identifiers

PMID41670762
PMCPMC13079252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.