Observational studyBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Prognostic performance of thymidine kinase 1 activity in patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 and aromatase inhibitors.
Observational study in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Avutometinib, Abemaciclib, and Fulvestrant in Patients with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated with CDK4/6 Inhibitor: A Single-Arm Phase I Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Prognostic role of thymidine kinase 1 activity in hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Review
- Comment on: "Prognostic performance of thymidine kinase 1 activity in patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 and aromatase inhibitors".Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThymidine kinase 1 activity (TKa) has previously been demonstrated as a prognostic biomarker for progression-free survival (PFS) in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but its optimal use remains undefined. This study evaluated the prognostic performance of TKa across multiple sampling time points and thresholds in patients receiving first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor plus aromatase inhibitor therapy.
methodsTKa was measured (DiviTum® assay) at baseline (BL), cycle 1 day 15 (C1D15), and cycle 2 day 1 (C2D1) in patients enrolled in the PDM-MBC study (n = 90). Thresholds for PFS discrimination were identified using maximally selected rank statistics, with predefined cut-offs tested for comparison. Prognostic performance was assessed using the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) and Harrell's concordance index (C-index).
resultsTKa was prognostic at all time points. Data-derived thresholds identified groups with differing PFS and overall survival (OS), and predefined cut-offs (≥ 50, ≥ 100, ≥ 250 DiviTum® units of Activity [DuA]) also discriminated survival outcomes. BL and C2D1 models performed better than C1D15 and comparably to multi-time-point models. Among patients with BL TKa ≥ 250 DuA, suppression to < 100 DuA at C1D15 was associated with longer median PFS (23.9 vs. 10.3 months; p = 0.034).
conclusionBaseline TKa provides prognostic information, with potential added value from repeated testing in those with high baseline levels. TKa behaves as a continuous biomarker of risk, and continuous modelling may offer more clinically informative individual risk estimation, while thresholds may retain value for specific clinical contexts. Validation in larger cohorts is warranted to support integration into routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.