ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Treating SOD1-ALS with tofersen results in nonprogressive chronic ALS-a case series from Iceland.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. We describe four patients with hereditary ALS caused by the p.Gly94Ser SOD1 mutation who were treated monthly with the intrathecal antisense oligonucleotide tofersen in a clinical setting at Landspitali University Hospital of Iceland. After initiating treatment 15-26 months ago, no significant clinical deterioration was observed, and three patients showed signs of clinical improvement, with some recovery of motor function. All four patients currently present with chronic nonprogressive ALS, a phenotype not previously observed or documented. Concomitantly, the concentration of neurofilament light chain (Nf-L) in the cerebrospinal fluid decreased to the normal range. This clinical benefit and decrease in Nf-L levels were detected regardless of the patient's initial ALSFRS-R score. No serious adverse events were observed. Notably, we observed a clinically meaningful effect in two patients who had been ill for several years before treatment was instituted, raising questions about who should receive treatment and the biology of paresis and motor neuron cell loss in patients with ALS. Although only a minority of ALS patients carry a SOD1 mutation, the advent of this new precision medicine has profound implications for ALS management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.