Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41670732›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2026

Longitudinal myelin MR imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis: a narrative review.

Lis J M van den Boogaard, Agata Bochman, Gerhard S Drenthen, Stephanie A M Knippenberg, Simone Monachino, Oliver H H Gerlach, Jacobus F A Jansen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lis J M van den BoogaardDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands. lis.vandenboogaard@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3327-5093
Agata BochmanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Gerhard S DrenthenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7708-8501
Stephanie A M KnippenbergMental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9871-4686
Simone MonachinoDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1596-0667
Oliver H H GerlachMental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3883-5561
Jacobus F A JansenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5271-8060

Funding

Hersenstichting PPS-BR-2030-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progression of multiple sclerosis (MS) remains incompletely understood. MS is characterized by demyelination, resulting in a wide variety of symptoms. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the current standard for diagnosing and monitoring patients. However, conventional MRI has its limitations in visualizing the myelin dynamics. In contrast, advanced myelin-specific MRI techniques enable non-invasive, in vivo quantification of myelin content. Such approaches hold promises for the early detection of pathology and for improving the understanding of disease mechanisms and their relationship to clinical outcomes, particularly since many patients with MS experience progression of symptoms that cannot be fully explained by conventional imaging measures. This narrative literature review aims to summarize recent advances in longitudinal myelin-specific MRI studies in MS and their clinical applications. Overall, longitudinal studies demonstrated that myelin-specific MRI techniques can capture dynamic changes in myelin, possibly aiding in understanding the progression of MS, although inconsistencies persist both between and within techniques. Even though more myelin-sensitive than myelin-specific methods, such as diffusion MRI or multi-contrast methods, are not specific to demyelination, they could aid clinical follow-up by predicting lesion formation, as changes are visualized before being present on conventional MRI. These findings underscore the need for future research that integrates MRI-derived metrics with detailed assessment of disease courses.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisMyelin SheathDisease ProgressionHumansLongitudinal StudiesLongitudinalMRIMultiple sclerosisMyelin

Identifiers

PMID41670732
PMCPMC12894440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.