ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
A new anatomical locking plate for scapular neck fractures: a finite element analysis and retrospective clinical study.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScapular neck fractures, typically caused by high-energy trauma, often require surgical fixation. Conventional reconstruction plates (RPs) are limited by poor anatomical conformity and extended operative times. We developed a novel scapular neck anatomical locking compression plate (SNALCP) and assessed its biomechanical stability and clinical performance.
methodsFinite element analysis (FEA) was used to compare the biomechanical behaviour of SNALCP and RP in Miller type IIA/B fractures, simulating forward flexion (FF), abduction (AB), internal rotation (IR), and external rotation (ER). Clinically, 40 patients treated between January 2021 and August 2023 were enrolled: RP group (n = 22) and SNALCP group (n = 18). Operative time, blood loss, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, healing time, complications, and Constant-Murley scores were evaluated.
resultsSNALCP demonstrated lower stress and displacement than RP across all loading conditions. For type IIA fractures, AB and FF stresses were 10.133 < 19.223 and 36.698 < 65.761 MPa; for type IIB, AB 63.089 < 97.578, FF 74.346 < 137.110, IR 379.290 < 540.640, and ER 1982.300 < 2253.100 MPa. Clinically, SNALCP yielded shorter surgical times (97.7 ± 19.3 min), less blood loss (152.6 ± 58.5 mL), faster healing (7.6 ± 1.4 weeks), and superior VAS and Constant-Murley scores (all p < 0.05). Only three cases of transient shoulder stiffness were observed.
conclusionSNALCP provides superior biomechanical stability and improved functional outcomes compared with RP. Larger, multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41670660What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.