ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Peripheral Perfusion Index: Normative Values from Electronically Reported CCHD Screening.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peripheral perfusion index (PPI) represents the ratio of pulsatile to non-pulsatile blood flow in an extremity and may be a valuable supplement to pulse oximetry in identification of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). To date, reference ranges of PPI of healthy neonates have not been published in the United States. We performed an observational retrospective study evaluating the PPI of healthy neonates between 24 and 48 h of life born in Minnesota, United States based on electronic reporting of CCHD screening to the Minnesota Department of Health. We evaluated preductal and postductal PPI measured at 24-48 h of age in 11,179 healthy infants born between 35- and 41-weeks gestation. We found that preductal PPI is significantly greater than postductal PPI and that PPI increases with gestational age and with birth weight. There was no difference in PPI by sex when adjusting for birth weight. Smoothed percentile curves of preductal and postductal PPI by gestational age were derived using the GAMLSS R Package with a Sinh-Arcsinh distribution. Our study is the first large, population-based study to establish normative data for PPI in healthy neonates in the United States. Our data overall replicate trends observed in large studies from India and China. Further research is needed to determine feasibility and utility of incorporation of PPI into CCHD screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41670639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.