ArticleJACC. Advances2026
Design and Architecture of a Generative-AI-Supported, Nonphysician-Delivered Model for GDMT Optimization in HFrEF: The ASSIST-HF Trial.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Four Pillars: A Risk-Targeted Framework for Vericiguat-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Reply: Generative AI-Powered Virtual Assistant for Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Generative AI-Powered Virtual Assistant for Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Finerenone Across the Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Continuum: From Mechanistic Rationale to Clinical Positioning-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence as the missing integrator in heart failure care - from remote monitoring to personalized therapy.Cardiology journal · 2026Review
- From monitoring to meaning: why artificial intelligence will redefine heart failure care.Cardiology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction require rapid initiation and uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), which is resource-intensive. In a prospective, open-label pilot trial, we assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a generative artificial intelligence-powered virtual assistant (VA), with retrieval-augmented generation and expert prompt engineering, to optimize GDMT. Patients with new heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n = 60) were randomized to VA-guided care, delivered by nonmedical staff at 2-weekly intervals or standard-of-care treatment delivered by doctors or nurses. At 12 weeks, patients in the VA arm had superior GDMT optimization across all medication classes, lower N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and fewer hospitalizations. Patient-reported acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility scores were high, with no safety disagreements between VA and clinician recommendations. Treatment by an artificial intelligence-powered VA, run by nonmedical staff, with minimal remote medical supervision, is acceptable to patients, and can safely and effectively optimize GDMT, representing a scalable strategy to optimize treatment and health care resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.