Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41670470›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2026

Expert stakeholders on the role of qualitative research in World Health Organisation guidelines.

Melissa Taylor, Paul Garner, Sandy Oliver, Nicola Desmond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa TaylorDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0006-3506-0902
Paul GarnerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom.
Sandy OliverEPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London WC1H 0NS, United Kingdom.
Nicola DesmondDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom.

Funding

READ-It 300342-104Research, Evidence and Development Initiative (READ-It)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative research findings are sometimes used in guideline development, but usually in an ad hoc manner. We sought to explore how qualitative research could contribute to guideline development, identify examples of qualitative research being used to inform guideline development, and gather suggestions for how qualitative research might be incorporated more systematically in guideline development. Using a topic guide, in 2022-24, we interviewed experts who had participated in World Health Organization (WHO) guideline development. We used purposeful sampling, including qualitative researchers, guideline developers, guideline panel members, and implementation researchers. We interviewed 16 participants, and identified three themes: (i) respondents endorsed using qualitative research findings in developing WHO guidelines, and highlighted examples where this approach had been useful; (ii) recommendation questions in the guideline process are built on clinical decision-making, which can sometimes be too detached from social contexts for broader health problems; (iii) using qualitative research findings to help delineate context has a greater potential role in guidelines. We interpret these findings to indicate that qualitative research could be used more systematically, particularly to inform a broader framing of a health problem, or later in recommendations, to tailor to particular contexts.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicQualitative ResearchStakeholder ParticipationWorld Health OrganizationHumansInterviews as Topicglobal healthguideline developmentqualitative evidence synthesisqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41670470
PMCPMC12972664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.