Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41670414›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026

Differences in Smooth Pursuit and Associated Saccades in Children With Two Common Types of Strabismus.

Elena Sanz, M Pilar Aivar, Jaime Tejedor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena SanzBasic Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
M Pilar AivarBasic Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jaime TejedorOphthalmology, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The main characteristics of smooth pursuit are well-described, but few studies have analyzed performance in strabismic patients, especially regarding differences between types of strabismus. In this study, we analyzed smooth pursuit eye movements of children with intermittent exotropia (IXT) or accommodative esotropia (AET), compared with age-matched controls. Methods: We included 58 children, aged between 4 and 13 years old (AET n = 24, IXT n = 18, and controls n = 16). After ophthalmological evaluation, eye movements were recorded using a Tobii Pro X3 eye tracker (120 Hz). Smooth pursuit was elicited by a single image moving sinusoidally at the horizontal axis of the screen, with a velocity of 11°/s. Smooth pursuit gain, latency, and frequency of saccades during pursuit, were analyzed. Results: Smooth pursuit showed different characteristics in the three groups. Gain was significantly lower in IXT, compared with the control group (0.66 vs 0.69; P < 0.01). In contrast, AET patients showed a significantly greater number of anticipatory saccades during pursuit (1.84 [1.46/2.23] vs 0.76 [0.57/0.94]; P = 0.028) compared with controls. No differences were found in latency between the three groups, although we observed faster responses when a saccade occurred (259.2 vs 282.81 ms). A laterality analysis showed better performance for rightward than leftward movements and small differences between nasal and temporal pursuit directions. Conclusions: Smooth pursuit is affected by strabismus, but performance differs between clinical subtypes. We hypothesized that the smooth pursuit system is primarily affected in IXT, whereas the saccade system might be more affected in AET.

Indexed as

EsotropiaExotropiaPursuit, SmoothSaccadesAccommodation, OcularAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleOculomotor MusclesVision, Binocular

Identifiers

PMID41670414
PMCPMC12908720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.