ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
AI to Identify Strain-Sensitive Regions of the Optic Nerve Head Linked to Functional Loss in Glaucoma.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Pathophysiological Association Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Glaucoma: A Current Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The purposes of this study were to assess whether optic nerve head (ONH) biomechanics, quantified by tissue strain, improves classification of progressive visual field (VF) loss patterns in glaucoma beyond morphology, and to use saliency maps to identify ONH regions associated with the predictions. Methods: We recruited 249 patients with glaucoma (mean age 69 ± 5 years, 54% female patients). One eye per subject was imaged under (1) primary gaze and (2) primary gaze with IOP elevated to approximately 35 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) via ophthalmo-dynamometry. Twelve subjects were excluded due to poor scan quality/limited lamina cribrosa (LC) visibility. Experts classified subjects into four categories based on the presence of specific visual field defects (VFDs): (1) superior nasal step (N = 26), (2) superior partial arcuate (N = 62), (3) full superior hemifield defect (N = 25), and (4) other/non-specific defects (N = 124). Automatic segmentation and digital volume correlation computed neural tissue and LC strains. Biomechanical and structural features were input to a PointNet model. Three classification tasks were performed to detect: (1) superior nasal step, (2) superior partial arcuate, and (3) full superior hemifield defect. Data were split 80/20 (train/test). Area under the curve (AUC) assessed performance. Saliency maps (an explainable artificial intelligence [XAI] technique) highlighted ONH regions most critical to classification. Results: Models achieved AUCs of 0.77 to 0.88 across VFD classifications. The structure-only model reached an AUC of 0.83 ± 0.02 for superior arcuate defects, which significantly improved to 0.87 ± 0.02 (P < 0.05) with the addition of strain information, demonstrating that ONH biomechanics enhance prediction beyond morphology. Strain-sensitive regions were localized to the inferior and inferotemporal rim, expanding with increasing severity of VF loss. Conclusions: ONH strain enhances classification of glaucomatous VF loss patterns. The neuroretinal rim, rather than the LC, was most critical, suggesting rim strain may play a dominant role in axonal injury and functional loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.