ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Post-surgery level of circulating DNA in stage III colon cancer patients: Impact on the reliability of minimal residual disease detection.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment using circulating nuclear DNA (cir-nDNA) testing has demonstrated strong prognostic value in patients with operable stage III colon cancer (CC). However, further clinical research is needed to optimize the use of adjuvant therapy in this context. Since the sensitivity of variant allele frequency (VAF)-based MRD detection depends on total cirDNA concentration, we investigated its variation in 67 stage III CC patients over 8 weeks following surgery. A majority of patients showed significantly higher post-surgical cir-nDNA levels compared to their pre-surgical baseline-71.1% during the first month and 51.4% during the second. Cir-nDNA levels tended to considerably vary (up to 18-fold), especially during the first 3 weeks after surgery. We also observed a strong correlation between cir-nDNA levels and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) markers throughout the 2-month post-operative period. While previous studies have generally assumed that cir-nDNA levels decrease significantly within 1 month post-surgery in MRD-negative stage III patients, our findings challenge this paradigm. NETs appear to be a substantial source of cir-nDNA and represent a major confounding factor in interpreting total cir-nDNA, given the high inter-individual variability in NETs production after surgery. Our data suggest that defining a single optimal time point for MRD testing may be misleading. Instead, we propose a sampling window between fourth and sixth week post-surgery. Additionally, our results call into question the reliance on VAF as a standalone metric for MRD detection. The most robust strategy would involve integrated monitoring of total cir-nDNA concentration, absolute mutant DNA levels, and NETs-associated inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.