Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41670377›Full record

ArticleJornal brasileiro de nefrologia

Coverage of procedures related to chronic kidney disease care in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS): analysis of the 2015-2024 decade.

Farid Samaan, Lan Hee Suh, Sônia Dias Lanza Freire, Ricardo Sesso, Gianna Mastroianni Kirsztajn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Farid SamaanSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Coordenadoria de Regiões de Saúde, Grupo de Planejamento e Avaliação, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4393-7330
Lan Hee SuhSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Coordenadoria de Regiões de Saúde, Grupo de Planejamento e Avaliação, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6831-6716
Sônia Dias Lanza FreireSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Coordenadoria de Regiões de Saúde, Grupo de Planejamento e Avaliação, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8223-8228
Ricardo SessoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Disciplina de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1062-0073
Gianna Mastroianni KirsztajnUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Disciplina de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1317-4109

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlobally, quantitative information on healthcare coverage for chronic kidney disease (CKD) is scarce. Our objective was to estimate the supply/demand ratio for CKD-related procedures in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) between 2015 and 2024.

methodsThe volume of tests, consultations and treatments related to CKD was retrieved from the website of the SUS Information Technology Department. The requirement parameters of these procedures were obtained from the Ministry of Health ordinances as well as from literature review. The percentage coverage of each procedure was defined by the ratio between the volume performed and the estimated need.

resultsCoverage of the following procedures increased between 2015 and 2024: serum creatinine dosage (70% to 122%), proteinuria testing (4% to 12%), kidney ultrasonography (76% to 107%), outpatient consultation with a nephrologist (48% to 164%), multidisciplinary care of pre-dialysis CKD (0% to 3%), and chronic dialysis (69% to 81%). Coverage of kidney biopsy remained nearly stable (19% to 21%). There was a reduction in coverage of arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis (HD) (66% to 59%) and of kidney transplantation (46% to 37%). The use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) among chronic dialysis methods (PD and HD) declined from 7% to 4%.

conclusionPossible explanations for these results include excessive creatinine testing and nephrology consultations, neglect of CKD screening for proteinuria, lack of adherence to multidisciplinary pre-dialysis follow-up, underutilization of PD, and insufficient availability of kidney biopsy and kidney replacement therapy (lower coverage of kidney transplantation compared to chronic dialysis).

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareNational Health ProgramsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicBrazilHumansKidney TransplantationRenal Dialysis

Identifiers

PMID41670377
PMCPMC12893125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.