ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026
Contrasting effects of experimental warming in the initiation year and the flowering year on flower phenology of boreal understory species.
Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
premiseHigh-latitude plants initiate flower primordia at least 1 year before flowering. While impacts of rising temperatures on phenology in the flowering year are well studied, the effects of warmer temperatures in the initiation year (IY; the year before flowering) are virtually unknown.
methodsAt 19 sites in interior Alaska, we experimentally warmed flower primordia of seven boreal species in the initiation year, flowering year, or both and tracked flowering phenology in the flowering year for two cohorts. For two species (Vaccinium uliginosum and Vaccinium vitis-idaea), we also tracked developmental stages of flower primordia.
resultsWarming in the flowering year resulted in earlier flowering for four species (V. vitis-idaea, Rhododendron groenlandicum, Viburnum edule, and Rosa acicularis), and in no change for two (V. uliginosum, and Rubus chamaemorus; not testable in Shepherdia canadensis). In contrast, warming in the IY resulted in delayed flowering for three species (S. canadensis, R. groenlandicum, and V. vitis-idaea), and no change for the others. Consistent with this pattern, V. vitis-idaea flower primordia at the end of the IY summer were less developed in warmed plots than in control plots, but for V. uliginosum there was no difference. Comparing phenology across all sites and years, early-flowering species had advanced flowering phenology following warm IY conditions, while late-flowering species had negative or nonlinear responses, with delays under the warmest IY temperatures.
conclusionsThe likely mechanism for delayed flowering in late-flowering plants following warm IY summers is early cessation of bud development at the end of the IY growing season.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.