Trial reportInternational journal of dermatology2026
Assessing the Dermal Epidermal Junction of Hyperkeratotic Actinic Keratoses via Line-Field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography.
Trial report in International journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Dermal Epidermal Junction of Hyperkeratotic Actinic Keratoses via Line-Field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography.International journal of dermatology · 2026Trial
- Line-Field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Dermal-Epidermal Junction in Actinic Keratosis and Skin Cancer.International journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- The Role of RCM and LC-OCT in Genodermatoses Associated with Skin Cancer: A Narrative Review.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionActinic keratoses (AKs) are ultraviolet (UV)-induced skin lesions that may progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Hyperkeratotic AKs hinder line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) imaging, limiting assessment of the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) and PRO-score, a histopathological index of dermal invasion.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate whether moisturization improves DEJ visualization and PRO-score evaluation in hyperkeratotic AKs using LC-OCT. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty-nine hyperkeratotic AKs were randomized to receive either 20-min tap water occlusion or 20% salicylic acid ointment (SAO). LC-OCT scans were taken before and after treatment. DEJ visibility, PRO-score (0-3), and confidence in PRO assignment (cPRO) were rated by blinded evaluators.
resultsDEJ visibility significantly increased posttreatment (from 39.0% to 86.4%, p = 0.015), with no significant difference between water and salicylic acid ointment (SAO). Confidence in PRO-scoring also improved (p < 0.001), and 39.1% of lesions with initial scores were reclassified. G2 AKs had higher DEJ visibility than G3 both before and after treatment.
conclusionMoisturization enhances LC-OCT evaluation of hyperkeratotic AKs, improving DEJ visualization and diagnostic confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.