ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
[Modeling of the Brazilian National Health Promotion Policy and its implementation sinuosities].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study sought to analyze a theoretical-logical model of the implementation of the Brazilian National Policy of Health Promotion (PNPS, acronym in Portuguese) via an Evaluability Assessment (EA). Data were collected from 2022 to 2023. The scenario involved nine states, the Federal District, and 48 municipalities. In total, 291 documents and 276 key informants were searched. A Theoretical-Logical Model (TLM, an EA product) was elaborated and validated in five regional workshops with 112 participants. Due to its complexity, the PNPS requires a TLM with an imaging representation unlike that of conventional TLM (which have a unidirectional sequence). The chosen TLM evinced the principles, values, guidelines, components, activities, and resources in the implementation of the PNPS across Brazil. The discussion of the results has four sections: the problem and the confluences that structure the PNPS (problem and context); inspirations and directionalities in implementing the PNPS (principles, values, and guidelines), subsidies and movements that materialized the PNPS (physical, organizational, and symbolic resources), and the PNPS outcomes and strengths: between what is and what comes to be (activities, actions, results, monitoring, and evaluation). The results show the institutionalization of the PNPS by local policies and actions aimed at chronic noncommunicable diseases. Monitoring and Evaluation showed no specific indicators, evincing the need to invest in them within the PNPS. Despite no indicators, the impact of the interactions between the elements that make up the PNPS implementation design may meet the needs of the original problem. The PNPS includes articulation with other policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.