Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41670079›Full record

ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026

[Critical analysis of the conceptualization of work among older adults in the contemporary era].

José Rosario González-Ulloa, Adriana Elizabeth Morales-Sánchez, Cecilia Andrea Ordoñez-Hernández, Georgina Vega-Fregoso, Ricardo Fletes-Corona

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

José Rosario González-UlloaUniversidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México.ORCID 0009-0005-7790-2162
Adriana Elizabeth Morales-SánchezUniversidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México.ORCID 0000-0003-0000-7555
Cecilia Andrea Ordoñez-HernándezUniversidad Libre, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9296-3768
Georgina Vega-FregosoUniversidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-1699
Ricardo Fletes-CoronaUniversidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México.ORCID 0000-0002-3513-352X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This critical essay analyzes conceptualizations of work in aged individuals between 2000 and 2025 from a Western perspective. Given the emergence of new labor relations in this globalized world, it is imperative to adjust or construct conceptual definitions of work that allow for a comprehensive view of its implications for older adults. The objective of this essay was to argue how the one-dimensional conceptualization of work reduces the ability to explain the new dynamics in the work of older people. In terms of the methodology used, this research followed the critical essay format, using inductive logic, starting from the specific to the general, under Toulmin's argumentative model. We found that conceptualizations of work in old age have focused on the micro and macrosocial levels. At the microsocial level, the concepts of productive aging, work identity, occupational therapy, and workaholism were identified. These concepts are related to experiences, role transitions, advantages, and disadvantages perceived by older workers. At the macrosocial level, the concepts of non-traditional work, fair work, and the gender division of labor were identified, which recognize the influence of economic, political, and cultural aspects on labor relations in old age. In conclusion, the conceptualizations that have been developed so far have not yet succeeded in consolidating an explanatory theory that would allow us to establish a definition of work in old age.

Indexed as

AgingConcept FormationEmploymentWorkAgedFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID41670079
PMCPMC12884586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.