ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2026
Global Functioning and Mental Health Parameters: Examining Interplay and Improvements in Inpatient Psychiatry.
Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global Functioning and Mental Health Parameters: Examining Interplay and Improvements in Inpatient Psychiatry.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGlobal functioning is a common clinician-rated measure of treatment changes in inpatient psychiatric care, but its broad scope may limit its sensitivity to specific mental health changes. This study aimed to research interplay and improvements of global functioning and several mental health parameters.
methodsAt admission and discharge 561 inpatients at a psychiatric clinic received assessments for global functioning, depression severity (clinician- and self-rated), sleep quality, quality of life, life satisfaction, and mood level. ANCOVAs assessed mean changes, while multiple linear regressions explored predictors of global functioning at both time points and over time.
resultsGlobal functioning and most mental health parameters significantly improved (p < 0.001-0.019, partial η
conclusionThe strong association between clinician-rated measures suggests a halo effect. A diagnostic and visualized integration of clinician- and self-rated measures is proposed for more reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.