Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41670016›Full record

ReviewPediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology2026

Wheat allergy, a new and emerging threat of food allergy for children.

Pakit Vichyanond, Ken-Ichi Nagakura, Punchama Pacharn, Gary Wong, Hugh A Sampson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Wheat allergy, a new and emerging threat of food allergy for children.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pakit VichyanondDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5103-2916
Ken-Ichi NagakuraDepartment of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Punchama PacharnDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2507-2057
Gary WongDepartment of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5939-812X
Hugh A SampsonDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1613-8875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to cow's milk, eggs and peanut, knowledge on wheat allergy is limited. During the past 2 decades, IgE-mediated wheat allergy in children has been frequently observed all over the World, especially in Asia. Wheat allergy usually presents in infants between 6 and 12 months of age. Common clinical manifestations are skin rashes (maculopapular rash, urticaria and angioedema). Atopic dermatitis is a less common presenting manifestation in wheat allergy compared to those with egg and cow's milk allergy. Anaphylaxis occurs in up to 50% of wheat allergy in children. Wheat-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis is more common among older children, teenagers and adults. Skin prick testing with water-soluble extract of wheat gave low diagnostic sensitivity. This is because major wheat allergens are alcohol-soluble proteins. Specific IgE to components of wheat such as ω-5 gliadin could increase diagnostic accuracy. The use of these component-resolved wheat allergens both in singleplex and multiplex tests is available but the accuracy of these tests remains to be verified. Wheat avoidance is difficult to carry out since wheat is used for cooking in a wide variety of daily diets. Oral immunotherapy to wheat has been extensively investigated over the past 15 years among children with varying degrees of wheat sensitivities. Most of these children achieved some degree of desensitization to wheat but only a few attained sustained unresponsiveness. To date, it is unclear how long wheat oral immunotherapy should be maintained. Recently, an outbreak in Japan on allergy to soap containing hydrolyzed-wheat suggested that the route of sensitization of wheat was through skin. Discontinuation of marketing of this soap led to cessation of the epidemic. Such knowledge warrants further investigation in children so that a prevention measure for wheat allergy among high-risk infants can be designed.

Indexed as

Desensitization, ImmunologicWheat HypersensitivityAllergensAnaphylaxisChildHumansImmunoglobulin EInfantSkin TestsTriticumAllergensImmunoglobulin Eanaphylaxisoral food challengeoral immunotherapywheat allergyω‐5 gliadin

Identifiers

PMID41670016
PMCPMC12892388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.