Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41669883›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2026

Biomarkers of Cardioembolic Stroke in Thrombus Composition: Diagnostic Value of DNA and Fibrin Content.

Jéromine Fasille, Mialitiana Solo Nomenjanahary, Dorothée Faille, Capucine Habay, Laurine Bedoucha, Maeva Kyheng, Julien Labreuche, Arturo Consoli, Bertrand Lapergue, Michel Piotin and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jéromine FasilleUniversité de Paris Cité, Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie, U1144 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), FHU Neurovasc, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4494-7143
Mialitiana Solo NomenjanaharyUniversité de Paris Cité, Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie, U1144 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), FHU Neurovasc, Paris, France.
Dorothée FailleUniversité de Paris Cité, Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie, U1144 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), FHU Neurovasc, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4414-739X
Capucine HabayUniversité de Paris Cité, Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie, U1144 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), FHU Neurovasc, Paris, France.
Laurine BedouchaUniversité de Paris Cité, Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie, U1144 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), FHU Neurovasc, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3165-8717
Maeva KyhengUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, EA 2694, Santé Publique: épidémiologie et qualité Des Soins, France.
Julien LabreucheUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, EA 2694, Santé Publique: épidémiologie et qualité Des Soins, France.
Arturo ConsoliDepartment of Stroke Centre and Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Versailles and Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Bertrand LapergueDepartment of Stroke Centre and Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Versailles and Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Michel PiotinDepartment of Interventional Neuro Radiology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Raphael BlancDepartment of Interventional Neuro Radiology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Benoit Ho-Tin-NoéUniversité de Paris Cité, Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie, U1144 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), FHU Neurovasc, Paris, France.
Mikael MazighiUniversité de Paris Cité, Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie, U1144 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), FHU Neurovasc, Paris, France.
Jean Philippe DesillesUniversité de Paris Cité, Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie, U1144 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), FHU Neurovasc, Paris, France.
Lucas Di MeglioUniversité de Paris Cité, Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie, U1144 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), FHU Neurovasc, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5158-8612
Compo CLOT Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCryptogenic strokes, accounting for 25%-40% of ischemic strokes, represent a major challenge in secondary prevention due to their uncertain etiology and high recurrence risk. Identifying biomarkers to reliably distinguish cardioembolic (CE) strokes among embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) could help guide therapeutic decisions. Previous studies have indicated thrombus DNA content as a potential biomarker of CE stroke etiology, but direct quantification of fibrin, another key component, has not been adequately explored.

methodsWe analyzed thrombi collected from 186 ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment between 2019 and 2023. Thrombi were processed using a quantitative method based on ex vivo tPA-mediated fibrinolysis followed by mechanical homogenization. Stroke etiology was classified according to TOAST criteria: 40% cardioembolic, 24% non-cardioembolic (large artery atherosclerosis or dissection), and 36% ESUS. Biomarker content was correlated with stroke etiology, and the diagnostic performance of DNA and fibrin (D-dimer) content was evaluated.

resultsCardioembolic thrombi contained significantly higher levels of DNA (median [IQR]: 325.3 [177-484] ng/mg) and D-dimer (17.5 [9.1-23.8] μg/mg) compared to non-cardioembolic thrombi (DNA: 128 [76.4-263] ng/mg; D-dimer: 11.4 [6.8-13.2] μg/mg), with no significant differences observed in heme or GPVI content. The combined use of thrombus DNA and fibrin (D-dimer) content provided good discrimination between CE and non-CE thrombi, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.87).

conclusionDNA and fibrin content in thrombi are promising biomarkers for identifying cardioembolic stroke etiology. Prospective studies should evaluate their use in selecting ESUS patients who may benefit from anticoagulant therapy.

Indexed as

DNAEmbolic StrokeFibrinFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsStrokeThrombosisAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersDNAFibrinFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DbiomarkerDNAESUSfibrinsecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID41669883
PMCPMC12892118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.