ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2026
Whole-exome sequencing for identification of genetic changes in adult-onset posterior polar cataract.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePosterior polar cataract (PPC), a rare congenital cataract, is characterized by subcapsular opacities in the lens affecting vision and posing surgical challenges. Genetic heterogeneity exists, though several genes are implicated in its pathogenesis. This study reports on the genetic profile of late-onset PPC cases and identifies variations specific to posterior capsular rupture (PCR) during surgery.
methodsDetailed clinical and genetic history was documented from 100 clinically diagnosed PPC patients and 100 controls. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed in 30 patients and 15 controls, and pathogenic variants were validated in 70 patients and 85 controls by Sanger sequencing.
resultsBilateral PPC was seen in 58%, sporadic cases were 61%, while 39% had a family history. Phacoemulsification was performed on 89 patients, with 12 patients experiencing PCR. Analysis revealed novel and reported variations in the genes - CRYAB (c.328T>G; p.C110G), CRYGB - (c.331A>C; p.I111L), (c.44G>A; p.R15H), CRYBG3 - ( c.1115C>T; p.S372F), CRYBA1 - (c.516A>C; p.G172H), along with EPHA2 (c.1114 G>A; p.E372K), GJA3- (c.895C>A; p.L299M), and PITX3 (c.285C>T; p.I95I). CRYBG3 and GJA3 variations were common among the PCR cases.
conclusionResults indicate genetic heterogeneity with no mutation hotspots, and the absence of PITX3 variations in our patient cohort is interesting. The study highlights the importance of mutation screening and genotype-phenotype relationships and underscores the importance of accurate diagnosis for enhanced cataract care and management. Subsequent functional studies on the role of these genes may help in understanding normal lens development and provide insights for advanced surgical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.