Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41669729›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology2026

Imaging-Detected Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Significance and a Standardized Imaging Assessment.

Jeong Hyun Lee, Dongjun Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extranodal extension (ENE) is an important adverse prognostic factor in head and neck cancer and has significant implications for treatment planning. Traditionally, pathologic ENE has guided nodal staging and postoperative management; however, its assessment is limited to surgically treated patients. In contrast, imaging-detected ENE (iENE) can be evaluated before treatment in all patients, regardless of treatment modality, underscoring its growing clinical relevance. Despite this advantage, variability in imaging interpretation has persisted due to the lack of standardized definitions and diagnostic criteria. Recent international consensus efforts have addressed this gap by proposing standardized terminology and a tiered classification system for iENE to enhance reproducibility and clinical communication. This review summarizes the concept and clinical significance of iENE from a radiologist's perspective, examines the limitations of previously proposed imaging criteria, and provides a stepwise explanation of the standardized classification system. Practical considerations for applying this system in routine radiologic interpretation and reporting are also discussed.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingExtranodal ExtensionHead and Neck NeoplasmsLymph NodesTumor Staging

Identifiers

PMID41669729
PMCPMC12883938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.