ReviewJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology2026
Imaging-Detected Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Significance and a Standardized Imaging Assessment.
Review in Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Preface to the Special Issue on 'Recent Updates in AJCC Staging of Head and Neck Cancer'].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extranodal extension (ENE) is an important adverse prognostic factor in head and neck cancer and has significant implications for treatment planning. Traditionally, pathologic ENE has guided nodal staging and postoperative management; however, its assessment is limited to surgically treated patients. In contrast, imaging-detected ENE (iENE) can be evaluated before treatment in all patients, regardless of treatment modality, underscoring its growing clinical relevance. Despite this advantage, variability in imaging interpretation has persisted due to the lack of standardized definitions and diagnostic criteria. Recent international consensus efforts have addressed this gap by proposing standardized terminology and a tiered classification system for iENE to enhance reproducibility and clinical communication. This review summarizes the concept and clinical significance of iENE from a radiologist's perspective, examines the limitations of previously proposed imaging criteria, and provides a stepwise explanation of the standardized classification system. Practical considerations for applying this system in routine radiologic interpretation and reporting are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.