ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2026
Evaluation of Corneal Irregular Astigmatism and Visual Quality Following Bilateral Sequential SMILE and LASEK: A Six-Year Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial altitude factors on the association with myopia: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Corneal Irregular Astigmatism and Visual Quality Following Bilateral Sequential SMILE and LASEK: A Six-Year Comparative Study.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the corneal spherical component (SC), regular astigmatism (RA), irregular astigmatism (IA, including asymmetry and irregularity), and visual quality 6 years after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for mild-to-moderate myopia. Methods: This retrospective, comparative study comprised the SMILE group (35 eyes) and LASEK group (36 eyes). Visual acuity, corneal topography utilizing swept-source anterior segment OCT, and wavefront aberrations were recorded preoperatively and 6 years postoperatively. Fourier analysis of keratometric-derived parameters of the anterior, posterior, and total cornea at 6 mm zone was evaluated. Results: Six years postoperatively, the safety and efficacy indices were comparable between both groups. Fourier analysis revealed significant changes in SC decrease and asymmetry increase of the anterior and total cornea ( Conclusions: Both SMILE and LASEK are safe and effective procedures for correction of mild-to-moderate myopia. LASEK demonstrates an advantage in flattening the anterior cornea and reducing regular astigmatism, while SMILE exhibits superior performance in inducing less horizontal coma
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.