Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41669683›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026

The dual effects of anesthetics on glial cells: a review of neuroprotection and neurotoxicity.

Xiaodong Wang, Minghe Zhao, Zhihui Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaodong Wang *Affiliated Baotou Clinical College of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Baotou, China.
Minghe Zhao *Affiliated Baotou Clinical College of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Baotou, China.
Zhihui LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Baotou Central Hospital, Baotou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glial cells-comprising astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes-are fundamental to central nervous system (CNS) homeostasis, yet their interactions with anesthetics are not fully elucidated. This review narratively synthesizes current evidence on the differential effects of local and general anesthetics on these cells, revealing a complex duality of neuroprotective and neurotoxic outcomes. Local anesthetics such as lidocaine can confer protection by inducing astrocytic autophagy and suppressing microglial pro-inflammatory responses, whereas bupivacaine may impair astrocytic mitochondrial function and potentiate excitotoxicity. Conversely, general anesthetics exhibit divergent impacts: propofol demonstrates protective properties against oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, but isoflurane often induces astrocytic cytotoxicity, activates microglia via the NF-κB pathway, and triggers apoptosis in developing oligodendrocytes, thereby disrupting myelination. These effects are critically influenced by anesthetic type, concentration, exposure duration, and the pathological context. Our analysis underscores the necessity of understanding these glial-centric mechanisms to optimize anesthetic safety, particularly for vulnerable populations such as the young and the elderly. Ultimately, advancing the knowledge of how anesthetics modulate glial cell function is pivotal for developing personalized anesthesia strategies that minimize neurotoxicity and harness potential protective effects, thereby improving postoperative neurological outcomes and guiding future translational research.

Indexed as

anestheticsastrocytescentral nervous systemglial cellsmicroglianeuroinflammationneurotoxicityoligodendrocytes

Identifiers

PMID41669683
PMCPMC12883979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.