ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Functional connectivity study on visually evoked auditory response based on high-density electroencephalography.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to investigate the brain activity involved in visually evoked auditory response (vEAR) using high-density electroencephalography (EEG) and explore the differences in connections between visual and auditory cortex. Methods: Thirty-seven subjects with vEAR and Thirty four subjects without vEAR, matched by age and gender, were recruited. The hearing threshold, years of education, and the Trail Making Test (versions A and B) results were collected from all patients. All participants underwent a 256-channel EEG, and neurophysiological differences were evaluated using standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA). Results: Trail Making Test scores in vEAR group were 17.3 ± 2.70 s and 26.28 ± 3.83 s for versions A and B, respectively, and 20.13 ± 6.88 s and 46.65 ± 5.971 s, respectively, in non-vEAR group. Significant difference in version B score was observed between two groups. Compared with non-vEAR group, significant differences were observed at the delta ( Conclusion: vEAR group showed stronger regional connection characteristics than non-vEAR group, which may represent a neural signature associated with vEAR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.